4.7 Article

Efficient photocatalytic production of hydrogen peroxide by Z-scheme resorcinol-formaldehyde resin/g-C3N4 heterostructure under visible light

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 454, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.140504

关键词

Ball-milling; Photocatalysis; H2O2; Z-scheme heterojunction; g-C3N4

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A Z-scheme heterostructure was successfully prepared between RF resin and g-C3N4 by mechanochemical method, which not only generated C=O group at a lower temperature (180°C), but also produced as high as 72.86 umol H2O2 in 12 h under visible light, 2.37 times higher than that of bare RF resin. This study provides a new approach for low-cost and high-performance H2O2 production under visible light.
Photocatalytic production of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in pure water system under visible light is very desirable. Resorcinol-Formaldehyde (RF) resin has proven to be a promising photocatalyst for this purpose because of its high solar-to-chemical conversion (SCC) (similar to 0.5 %). However, RF resin prepared at low hydrothermal temperature is not satisfactory because the C=O group, which is detrimental to the H2O2 production will only be generated when it is >250 degrees C. Herein, we successfully prepared a Z-scheme heterostructure between RF resin and g-C3N4 by mechanochemical method. The ball milled RF-g-C3N4 (RF-CN-bm) not only achieved C=O group at a lower temperature (180 degrees C) but also produced as high as 72.86 umol H2O2 in 12 h under visible light, which is 2.37 times higher than that of bare RF resin. Moreover, we found that Z-scheme heterojunction was formed between RF and g-C3N4, which allowed the H2O2 production both through O-2 reduction by CB e(-) of g-C3N4 and the combination of center dot HO that produced by oxidation of OH- by VB h(+) of RF. In principle, the mechanochemical assembled RF-CN-bm developed in this study paves a new way for low-cost and high-performance H2O2 production under visible light.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据