4.7 Article

Mimicking the competitive interactions to reduce resistance induction in antibacterial actions

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 454, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.140215

关键词

Antibacterial materials; Biomimetic materials; Mechano-bactericidal actions; Bacterial resistance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biomimetic materials that mimic competitive interactions in ecosystems offer a promising solution to address bacterial resistance. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using spiny particles to compete with bacteria for nutrients and inhibit their growth without inducing bacterial resistance. The material also shows good biocompatibility, making it a potential candidate for applications in reducing bacterial resistance.
Bacterial resistance induced by antibacterial nanomaterials alert us that winning the arms race between bacteria and antibacterial agents requires new ideas. We provide a proof-of-concept investigation into mimicking competitive interactions in ecosystems to control bacteria contamination. Competitors in ecosystems can have similar geometry scale and gain advantages via strategies such as physical killing and nutrient competition. Antibacterial materials can be designed to mimic these competitive strategies to address the problem of bacterial resistance induced by nanomaterials. Herein, we tune the morphology of spiny particles (NH2-MIL-101(Al) MOFs) to prove our concept. Their mechano-bactericidal activity was proved in this work, they also competed nutrients with bacteria and did not leach antibacterial chemicals to the microenvironment. This material showed potential to prevent inducing bacterial resistance over time as demonstrated in this work. Furthermore, the biocompatibility was tested in vitro using MDA-MB-231 cells, the particles can be engulfed into the cells without inducing necrosis or apoptosis. This work demonstrated the feasibility of mimicking the competitive interactions by biomimetic materials to reduce bacterial resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据