4.7 Article

High-temperature wettability and structure of the TiO2-MnO-SiO2-Al2O3 welding flux system

期刊

JOURNAL OF NON-CRYSTALLINE SOLIDS
卷 432, 期 -, 页码 218-226

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.10.009

关键词

Wettability; FTIR; Raman; XPS; Slag structure

资金

  1. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) - Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Republic of Korea [20132520000030]
  2. Students' Association of the Graduate School of Yonsei University - Graduate School of Yonsei University
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20132520000030] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of TiO2/SiO2 and SiO2/Al2O3 ratio on the wettability of the TiO2-MnO-SiO2-Al2O3 quaternary welding flux system was studied using the sessile drop method by measuring the contact angle at the liquid/solid interface. The contact angle was measured at 1773 K to determine the relationship between wettability and flux structure, which is affected by the flux composition. The surface and interfacial tensions of the TiO-MnO-SiO2-Al2O3 flux system were calculated using Boni's equation and Young's equation, respectively, based on the measured contact angle. The adhesion energy, which corresponds to the energy required to separate the flux from a substrate, was calculated using Dupre's equation. The interfacial tension between the liquid flux and Pt-10Rh decreased and the surface tension increased with higher TiO2 and Al2O3. The results of the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Raman spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analyses of as-quenched fluxes from 1773 K also support the structural relationship with the wettability. It was found that both O- (non-bridged oxygen) and O2- (free oxygen) affect the interfacial tension between the flux and the substrate. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据