4.5 Article

Mathematical modeling the methanol production process for direct CO2 hydrogenation over a gallium (Ga3Ni5) catalyst

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2022.109218

关键词

CO2 hydrogenation; Green methanol; Ga3Ni5 catalyst; Mathematical modeling; MATLAB software

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a simulation was conducted to model an efficient process for direct CO2 hydrogenation to produce methanol using Ga3Ni5 catalyst. The results showed that the Ga3Ni5 catalyst had a conversion rate of carbon dioxide to methanol that was 13.75% higher compared to the traditional Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst. Therefore, this new catalyst has the potential to replace the traditional synthesis process.
Carbon capture and utilization as a raw material for methanol production is a good option for addressing environmental, energy and global warming problems. However, commercial methanol synthesis processes have poor performance due to high water production during the process, oxidation and inactivation of the catalyst, and low CO2 conversion. To overcome these barriers, in this study, an efficient process consisting of Ga3Ni5 catalyst for direct CO2 hydrogenation is modeled. Synthesis equations and reaction rate constants, adsorption equilibrium constants and reaction equilibrium constants were used to model the methanol production process in the vicinity of the Ga3Ni5 catalyst using MATLAB software. In the new process, in order to increase safety and control process costs, the process pressure was reduced from 76.98 bar to 2 bar, on the other hand, the water produced as the poisoning agent of Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst is significantly ineffective in this configuration. The results show that Ga3Ni5 catalyst increases the conversion rate of carbon dioxide to methanol by about 13.75% compared to Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst. The proposed catalyst is an active and stable catalyst for methanol pro-duction that can compete with the traditional synthesis process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据