4.7 Article

Preparation and characterization of glass ceramics synthesized from lead slag and lead-zinc tailings

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 49, 期 10, 页码 16164-16173

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.01.214

关键词

Lead slag; Lead-zinc tailings; Borax; Glass-ceramics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using lead slag and lead-zinc tailings to prepare high-value glass-ceramic can achieve the comprehensive utilization of solid waste and reduce environmental pollution. The sintering performance of lead slag is improved by melting and tempering it with lead-zinc tailings and borax. The resulting glass-ceramics exhibit excellent properties and resistance to heavy metal leaching.
Using lead slag and lead-zinc tailings to prepare high-value glass-ceramic can realize the comprehensive utilization of solid waste and reduce the environmental pollution caused by lead slag landfill. Firstly, lead-zinc tailings and borax are used to melt and temper lead slag to improve its sintering performance. At 1450 degrees C, the lead slag melted and tempered by adding 40% lead-zinc tailings and 4% borax has good fluidity in the molten state. In water quenching, crystallization is not easy, and the water quenching slag has good sintering performance. Then, the water-quenched slag obtained by melting and tempering lead slag with lead-zinc tailings and borax was ball-milled and mixed with 10% albite feldspar and sintered at 1050 degrees C for 90 min to prepare glass ceramics. The prepared glass-ceramics have excellent performance parameters such as bulk density of 2.79 g/ cm3, water absorption of 0.05%, the flexural strength of 102.18 MPa, acid resistance of 0.15%, and alkali resistance of 0.032%. Simultaneously, the glass ceramics exhibited excellent resistance to the leaching of heavy metals where the leaching concentrations of Pb, Zn, As, and Cd were 0.125, 1.268, 0.324, and 0.029 mg/L, respectively. This research can provide a new idea for comprehensively utilizing solid waste.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据