4.7 Article

In-situ laboratory X-ray diffraction applied to assess cement hydration

期刊

CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH
卷 162, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106988

关键词

X-ray diffraction; In-situ XRD; Laboratory XRD; Cement; Hydration

资金

  1. Brazilian governmental agency CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel)
  2. Brazilian governmental agency CNPq (Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development)
  3. Brazilian governmental agency FAPERGS (Foundation for Research Support of the State of Rio Grande do Sul)
  4. Spanish government [PID2020-114650RB-I00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses the use of in-situ laboratory XRD to assess cement hydration. It provides a literature review, discusses experimental strategies, recommends data analysis routine, and discusses the advantages and limitations of this technique.
In-situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) is a powerful tool to assess the hydration of cementitious materials, providing time-resolved quantitative analysis with reasonable accuracy without disturbing sample. However, the lack of guidelines and well-established procedures for data collection and analysis is the limiting factor for spreading this technique. This paper discussed using in-situ laboratory XRD to assess cement hydration. The first part was dedicated to a literature review on the topic. Then, experimental strategies were discussed, and recommenda-tions related to the data analysis routine were drawn; the advantages and limitations of this technique were also discussed. We can conclude that the critical factors for a successful analysis are the choice of an adequate experimental setup with good statistics and low measurement time, the proper consideration of different amorphous contributions in the XRD pattern, and a good data analysis routine. Independent techniques are highly recommended to support the in-situ XRD data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据