4.7 Article

Stability of SrCO3 within composite Portland-slag cement blends

期刊

CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES
卷 135, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104823

关键词

Strontium; Carbonate; Nuclear; Immobilisation; Reaction; Thermodynamics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The stability and reactivity of SrCO3 in blended Portland-slag cement were investigated using XRD, TG-MS, SEM-EDX, and thermodynamic modelling. It was found that the addition of 30 wt% SrCO3 caused minor reactions and increased formation of carbonated AFm phases at 20 degrees C. However, at 60 degrees C, the stability of ettringite decreased and prevented its stabilization. Thermodynamic modelling showed that SrCO3 had only minor reactivity up to 360 days, and carbonate remained stable. This suggests that SrCO3 is an effective immobilisation matrix for 14C in a blended Portland-slag cement waste form suitable for long-term geological disposal.
The stability and reactivity of SrCO3 within a blended Portland-slag cement at both 20 degrees C and 60 degrees C (to simulate an indicative waste form for disposal) was determined via XRD, TG-MS, SEM-EDX and thermodynamic modelling. Sr14CO3 is a potential long-term sink for trapping radioactive 14C, produced through the nuclear fuel cycle, therefore understanding its stability in potential cementitious waste forms is of interest and importance. Incorporation of 30 wt% SrCO3 in blended Portland-slag cement caused minor reactions to occur, resulting in increased formation of carbonated AFm phases, along with stabilisation of ettringite at 20 degrees C, precluded at 60 degrees C due to the reduced stability to ettringite at this temperature. Thermodynamic modelling predicted only minor SrCO3 reactivity up to 360 days, with carbonate remaining stable over this timeframe, validated by our experimental results. Thus, thermodynamic simulations predict that SrCO3 is an effective immobilisation matrix for 14C, within a blended Portland-slag cement waste form, suitable for long-term geological disposal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据