4.4 Article

Requirement for PINCH in skeletal myoblast differentiation

期刊

CELL AND TISSUE RESEARCH
卷 391, 期 1, 页码 205-215

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00441-022-03701-1

关键词

PINCH; Integrin pathway; Skeletal myogenesis; Cytoskeleton organization; Cell fusion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PINCH proteins play critical roles in skeletal muscle development and function. Loss of PINCH leads to abnormal skeletal muscle development and disrupted sarcomere structures, as well as impaired cell fusion and cytoskeleton organization. These findings reveal the crucial role of PINCH proteins in skeletal muscle development.
PINCH, an adaptor of focal adhesion complex, plays essential roles in multiple cellular processes and organogenesis. Here, we ablated PINCH1 or both of PINCH1 and PINCH2 in skeletal muscle progenitors using MyoD-Cre. Double ablation of PINCH1 and PINCH2 resulted in early postnatal lethality with reduced size of skeletal muscles and detachment of diaphragm muscles from the body wall. PINCH mutant myofibers failed to undergo multinucleation and exhibited disrupted sarcomere structures. The mutant myoblasts in culture were able to adhere to newly formed myotubes but impeded in cell fusion and subsequent sarcomere genesis and cytoskeleton organization. Consistent with this, expression of integrin beta 1 and some cytoskeleton proteins and phosphorylation of ERK and AKT were significantly reduced in PINCH mutants. However, N-cadherin was correctly expressed at cell adhesion sites in PINCH mutant cells, suggesting that PINCH may play a direct role in myoblast fusion. Expression of MRF4, the most highly expressed myogenic factor at late stages of myogenesis, was abolished in PINCH mutants that could contribute to observed phenotypes. In addition, mice with PINCH1 being ablated in myogenic progenitors exhibited only mild centronuclear myopathic changes, suggesting a compensatory role of PINCH2 in myogenic differentiation. Our results revealed a critical role of PINCH proteins in myogenic differentiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据