4.7 Article

Preparation, characterization and testing of a bulky non-supported photocatalyst for water pollution abatement

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 413, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2022.12.023

关键词

Photocatalyst; Semiconductor; Clay; Pellets; Photodegradation; Water treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An innovative bulky photocatalyst for water decontamination has been developed, which combines the excellent properties of TiO2 with those of a natural clay. The photocatalyst, prepared in the form of small pellets, prevents the activity reduction usually observed in supported catalysts and can be easily reused. It showed optimum activity at a 40% clay / 60% P25 ratio and higher calcination temperatures negatively affected its performance.
An innovative bulky photocatalyst for water decontamination has been developed. The semiconductor (TiO2) is homogeneously distributed in an aggregating material through the whole piece. This design prevents the activity reduction usually observed in supported catalysts due to the loss of the photoactive layer, and facilitates its recovery for an easy reuse, which is a recurrent problem dealing with nanoparticles. The photocatalyst combines the excellent properties of TiO2 with those of a natural clay, which serves as binder, slows down the phase transition of anatase to rutile upon calcination, and has a synergetic function. The photocatalyst has been pre-pared in the form of small pellets with an Ecuadorian clay and TiO2 in the commercial form of P25 by evenly dry mixing, forming a paste with water, and subsequent extrusion, drying and calcination at 600 degrees C. The photo-degradation of phenol, as a model pollutant, has been achieved by using this aggregate material in a flow reactor with artificial UVA-Vis radiation, and reused without any significant loss of activity. The photocatalyst showed an optimum activity at a 40% clay / 60% P25 ratio, while higher calcination temperatures had a negative effect on its performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据