4.5 Article

The Effect of Al2O3 Pore Diameter on the Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis Performance of Co/Al2O3 Catalyst

期刊

CATALYSIS LETTERS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10562-022-04231-9

关键词

Fischer-Tropsch synthesis; Cobalt catalyst; Pore diameter; Ordered mesoporous alumina

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To investigate the impact of gamma-alumina pore size on the efficiency of Co/Al2O3 catalysts in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, ordered mesoporous alumina samples with different pore sizes were synthesized and Co/OMA catalysts were prepared. Characterization experiments were conducted and the relationship between catalyst structure and FTS performance was analyzed. The TOF and C5+ selectivity of the catalysts increased with increasing OMA pore size, while CH4 selectivity decreased. The particle size of Co3O4 in the catalysts was highly dependent on the OMA pore size, which was a crucial factor affecting catalyst performance.
In order to investigate the effect of gamma-alumina pore size on the ability of alumina-supported cobalt (Co/Al2O3) catalysts in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FTS), ordered mesoporous alumina (OMA) samples with different pore sizes (4.8, 7.2, 9.7 and 12.6 nm) were synthesized by various methods. Co/OMA catalysts with a Co loading of 15 wt% were prepared by the impregnation method. N-2 physisorption, X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), H-2-Temperature-Programmed Reduction (H-2-TPR), and H-2 Temperature-Programmed desorption (H-2-TPD) experiments were conducted to characterize the structure and properties of these catalysts, and the catalyst structure-FTS performance relationships were also analyzed. The TOF increases with OMA pore size increase from 4.8 to 9.7 nm and decreased when the OMA pore size increased further to 12.6 nm. The C5+ selectivity of catalysts increases with OMA pore size, while the CH4 selectivity decreased with which. The Co3O4 particle size of catalysts were depended highly on the OMA pore size, which was the vital factor affecting the performance of catalyst.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据