4.7 Article

Fully bio-based hydroxy ester vitrimer synthesized by crosslinking epoxidized soybean oil with doubly esterified starch

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 302, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120442

关键词

Epoxidized soybean oil; Modified starch; Hydroxyester dynamic covalent bond; Biomass; Vitrimer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Catalyst-free fully bio-based hydroxyester (BHE) vitrimers were synthesized by crosslinking and plasticizing epoxidized soybean oil with synthesized acetylated starch succinate monoesters to investigate the effects of different starch structures on the properties of the BHE vitrimers. The BHE vitrimers possessed a lower glass transition temperature, better solvent resistance, and reprocessing performance compared to traditional starch-based materials. Due to dynamically covalent bonds, the migration and exudation of plasticizers were avoided. A maximum strain of 230% was achieved to prevent the retrogradation and brittleness of starch-based materials. Furthermore, the mechanical properties remained unchanged after three reprocessing cycles. Consequently, the obtained BHE vitrimers are eco-friendly and sustainable.
Catalyst-free fully bio-based hydroxyester (BHE) vitrimers were synthesized by crosslinking and plasticizing epoxidized soybean oil with synthesized acetylated starch succinate monoesters to investigate the effects of different starch structures on the properties of the BHE vitrimers. The BHE vitrimers possessed a lower glass transition temperature as well as better solvent resistance and reprocessing performance compared to traditional starch-based materials. Owing to dynamically covalent bonds, the migration and exudation of plasticizers were avoided. A maximum strain of 230 % was achieved to prevent the retrogradation and brittleness of starch-based materials. Furthermore, the mechanical properties remained unchanged after three reprocessing cycles. Consequently, the obtained BHE vitrimers are eco-friendly and sustainable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据