4.3 Article

The association between microRNA polymorphisms and the risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A meta-analysis

期刊

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 81, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2022.102285

关键词

Meta-analysis; Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia; MicroRNA; Polymorphism; Case-control study

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This meta-analysis found no significant association between miR-146a rs2910164 and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia risk, but the polymorphisms of pri-miR-34b/c rs4938723 and miR-612 rs12803915 may be related to the development of the disease.
The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the relationship between microRNA polymorphisms and the risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia comprehensively. PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Global Index Medicus, Clinicaltrials.gov, ProQuest, and Open Grey databases were used to find relevant papers. Using the STATA 16.0 and CMA 3.0 software, the significance of relationships between microRNA polymorphisms and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia risk was evaluated using odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs) for five genetic models. The results of the meta-analysis showed that there was no significant association between the polymorphism of miR-146a rs2910164 and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia risk in different genetic models. Also, in the sensitivity analysis, removing Xue's study from the analysis indicated that both the homozygote and recessive models are significantly affected. Additionally, there was a statistically significant relationship between the polymorphisms of pri-miR-34b/c rs4938723 (in the homozygote and recessive models) and miR-612 rs12803915 (in the allele and dominant models) and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia risk. These findings suggest that the rs4938723 and rs12803915 polymorphisms may have a role in the development of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据