4.2 Article

Use of genome-wide testing in oncology: French expert opinion based on the Delphi methodology

期刊

BULLETIN DU CANCER
卷 110, 期 3, 页码 320-330

出版社

ELSEVIER MASSON, CORP OFF
DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2022.11.015

关键词

Breast cancer; NSCLC; Delphi; CUP; Melanoma; Genome-wide testing

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genome-wide testing plays a crucial role in advancing precision medicine in oncology; however, current recommendations lack specificity regarding its indications and utility for different types of cancer. To address this, a national consensus approach using a modified Delphi methodology was employed in France to provide expert opinions on the use of genome-wide testing in clinical practice. Consensus was reached through multiple rounds of rating, resulting in 24 statements agreed upon by the expert panel. While genome-wide testing was recommended for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and cancer of unknown primary (CUP), its routine use was not recommended for breast cancer and melanoma. The standardization of broad molecular screening in oncology may be facilitated by improved access to innovation in France.
In oncology, genome-wide testing is a major element in facilitating the implementation of precision medicine. However, current recommendations do not always specify the indication and utility of these tests according to the type of cancer. A national consensus approach based on a modified Delphi methodology was set up to provide expert opinion on the use of genome-wide testing in clinical practice in France. Four groups of experts - 4 each representing the following topics of interest - were defined: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), breast cancer, melanoma, and cancer of unknown primary (CUP). In each group, assertions were formulated by a lead expert (8, 5, 7 and 6, respectively) and rated by five panellists involved in the management of these cancers, on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 9 (strongly agree). Consensus was reached when 75% of the scores were above 7. In case of disagreement, the panellists were asked to justify their rate. In total, 24 statements reached consensus after two to four rounds of rating, depending on the group. While the experts advocated the routine use of genome-wide testing in the diagnostic management of NSCLC and CUP, they did not recommend the systematisation of these tests for breast cancer and melanoma. Nevertheless, access to innovation in France could soon remove certain barriers and allow greater standardisation of broad molecular screening in oncology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据