4.4 Article

Implementing antibiotic stewardship in high-prescribing English general practices: a mixed-methods study

期刊

出版社

ROYAL COLL GENERAL PRACTITIONERS
DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0298

关键词

antibiotic prescribing; antimicrobial resistance; antimicrobialstewardship; behaviour change; communication; C-reactive protein; delayed prescription; implementation; point-of-care testing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of an implementation intervention to improve antimicrobial stewardship strategies in high-prescribing practices did not have a significant effect on antibiotic prescribing. Clinicians need detailed information and monitoring of their engagement to ensure optimal use of these strategies.
Background Trials have identified antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) strategies that effectively reduce antibiotic use in primary care. However, many are not commonly used in England. The authors co-developed an implementation intervention to improve use of three AMS strategies: enhanced communication strategies, delayed prescriptions, and point-of-care C-reactive protein tests (POC-CRPTs).Aim To investigate the use of the intervention in high-prescribing practices and its effect on antibiotic prescribing.Design and setting Nine high-prescribing practices had access to the intervention for 12 months from November 2019. This was primarily delivered remotely via a website with practices required to identify an 'antibiotic champion'.Method Routinely collected prescribing data were compared between the intervention and the control practices. Intervention use was assessed through monitoring. Surveys and interviews were conducted with professionals to capture experiences of using the intervention.Results There was no evidence that the intervention affected prescribing. Engagement with intervention materials differed substantially between practices and depended on individual champions' preconceptions of strategies and the opportunity to conduct implementation tasks. Champions in five practices initiated changes to encourage use of at least one AMS strategy, mostly POC-CRPTs; one practice chose all three. POC-CRPTs was used more when allocated to one person.Conclusion Clinicians need detailed information on exactly how to adopt AMS strategies. Remote, one-sided provision of AMS strategies is unlikely to change prescribing; initial clinician engagement and understanding needs to be monitored to avoid misunderstanding and suboptimal use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据