4.4 Article

Characteristics of good home-based end-of-life care: analysis of 5-year data from a nationwide mortality follow-backsurvey in England

期刊

出版社

ROYAL COLL GENERAL PRACTITIONERS
DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0315

关键词

general practice; health inequities; palliative medicine; quality indicators; terminal care

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, there has been a focus on providing good-quality end-of-life care for patients living at home. This study used data from a national survey in England to determine the characteristics of good-quality end-of-life care for home-based patients. The results showed that patients who had good continuity of primary care and palliative care support experienced better overall quality of end-of-life care. Patients with cancer and those who died outside of hospital were more likely to receive good end-of-life care. Older age, being female, living in areas with lower socioeconomic deprivation, and being White were associated with better overall end-of-life care.
Background Recently, there has been an emphasis on providing good-quality end-of-life care; however, little is known about it and its determinants for patients living at home. Aim To determine what characterises good-quality end-of-life care for patients living at home. Design and setting An observational study using 5-year data from the National Survey of Bereaved People (Views of Informal Carers - Evaluation of Services [VOICES]) in England. Method Analysis was based on data for 63 598 decedents, who were cared for at home in the last 3 months of life. Data were drawn from 110 311 completed mortality follow-back surveys of a stratified sample of 246 763 deaths registered in England between 2011 and 2015. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent variables associated with overall quality of end- of-life care and other indicators of end-of-life care quality. Results Patients who received good continuity of primary care (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.03; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.01 to 2.06) and palliative care support (AOR 1.86; 95% CI = 1.84 to 1.89) experienced better overall quality of end- of-life care than those who did not, as perceived by relatives. Decedents who died from cancer (AOR 1.05; 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.06) or outside of hospital were more likely to receive good end-of-life care, as perceived by relatives. Being older, female (AOR 1.16; 95% CI = 1.15 to 1.17), from areas with least socioeconomic deprivation, and White (AOR 1.09; 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.12) were associated with better overall end- of-life care, as perceived by relatives. Conclusion Better quality of end-of-life care was associated with good continuity of primary care, specialist palliative care support, and death outside of hospital. Disparities still exist for those from minority ethnic groups and those living in areas of socioeconomic deprivation. Future commissioning and initiatives must consider these variables to provide a more-equitable service.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据