4.6 Article

Cyclic versus continuous deep brain stimulation in patients with obsessive compulsive disorder: A randomized controlled trial

期刊

BRAIN STIMULATION
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 82-87

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.01.1664

关键词

Deep brain stimulation; Cyclic; Obsessive compulsive disorder; Side effects; Battery life

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to improve deep brain stimulation (DBS) therapy for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) by optimizing energy efficiency and reducing adverse events (AEs) with a cyclic form of stimulation. The results showed that although cyclic stimulation reduced certain stimulation-related AEs, it posed a high relapse risk in patients with OCD.
Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule (vALIC) is effective for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but patients typically require high stimu-lation voltages and DBS comes with a risk for adverse events (AE).Objective: The aim of the present study was to advance DBS for OCD by optimizing energy efficiency and minimize adverse events using a cyclic form of stimulationMethods: This double blind, randomized crossover trial compares 2 weeks of continuous versus cyclic DBS (0.1 s ON, 0.2 s OFF) in 16 patients with OCD. We compared OCD symptoms (Yale-Brown Obsessive -Compulsive Scale, Y-BOCS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM -A), AEs, battery life, cognitive performance and quality of life.Results: Average Y-BOCS scores at baseline increased significantly with 5.5 points (p = 0.006) in the cyclic condition. Average HAM-D and HAM-A scores increased with 2.2 (p = 0.088) and 2.8 points (p = 0.018). The overall health scale of quality of life worsened during cyclic DBS (p = 0.044). Patients reported on average 3.3 AEs during continuous stimulation and 4.4 AEs during cyclic stimulation (p = 0.175), though stimulation-related AEs such as headache and concentration problems reduced during cyclic DBS. Battery usage during continuous DBS was 0.021 V per hour compared to 0.008 V per hour during cyclic DBS.Conclusion: Though specific stimulation-related AEs improved, cyclic stimulation (0.1 s ON, 0.2 s OFF) comes with a high relapse risk in patients with DBS for OCD. Cyclic DBS is no alternative for standard DBS treatment, but applicable in case of debilitating AEs.(c) 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据