4.4 Review

Effectiveness of exercise in improving quality of life in patients with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

BRAIN INJURY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2023.2165155

关键词

Traumatic brain injury; quality of life; exercise; physical activity; aerobic training

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effect of exercise on the quality of life in patients with traumatic brain injury. The findings suggest that exercise can improve the quality of life in these patients, but further long-term research is needed to confirm these results.
BackgroundTraumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of disability and mortality worldwide. People with TBI exhibit poor quality of life (QOL). Exercise is considered a possible intervention for improving cognitive function and mood, helping improve QOL in patients with TBI. According to our review of the relevant literature, meta-analyses have yet to explore the effect of exercise on QOL in patients with TBI.ObjectivesTo determine by meta-analysis of relevant studies whether physical exercise could promote QOL in patients with TBI.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies involving physical exercise for improving QOL outcomes in TBI populations were conducted according to the PRISMA guideline. Our inclusion criteria were as follows: being randomized or nonrandomized controlled trials with quantitative designs that included patients diagnosed with TBI.ResultsThus, six studies met the inclusion criteria. The interventions in four of the six studies had statistically significant effects on QOL improvement. Our meta-analysis revealed a moderate effect size of physical exercise on QOL promotion in patients with TBI.ConclusionFor TBI, exercise seems to improve QOL. More research with long-term follow-up should be conducted to assess the effect of exercise on patients with TBI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据