4.2 Article

Nursing management of patients receiving interstitial brachytherapy for head and neck malignancies

期刊

BRACHYTHERAPY
卷 22, 期 2, 页码 214-220

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.10.010

关键词

Nursing care; Head and neck interstitial brachytherapy; Interstitial brachytherapy; Head and neck cancer; Review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article aims to provide a comprehensive guide on nursing care for head and neck interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) to radiation oncologists and nurses, in order to promote the widespread use of this treatment strategy. Nurses caring for patients with head and neck cancer undergoing ISBT should have a thorough understanding of radiation therapy principles, technology, applicator management, and the acute and chronic side effects of ISBT.
Brachytherapy is a type of radiation therapy in which the radioactive source is directly delivered to the tumor and is used to treat a variety of malignancies. Although the local control effect of brachytherapy is higher than that of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), it is often the case that brachytherapy is more invasive than conventional EBRT. As a result, patients receiving head and neck brachytherapy confront several physical, nutritional, and pain management issues. The nurses caring for patients with head and neck cancer receiving high-dose rate interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) should have a thorough understanding of radiation therapy principles, tech-nology, applicator management, and the acute and chronic side effects of ISBT. However, there are no appropriate textbooks or review articles regarding nursing care for head and neck patients undergoing ISBT. The purpose of this article is to provide radiation oncologists and nurses who want to start head and neck ISBT with a comprehensive guide regarding nursing care and to help the wide spread of this treatment strategy.(c) 2022 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据