4.5 Article

The association between dietary polyphenol intake and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a case-control study

期刊

BMC PEDIATRICS
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12887-022-03768-3

关键词

Polyphenol; Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder; Nutrition

资金

  1. Isfahan University of Medical Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between dietary polyphenol intake and the risk of ADHD in preschool and school children. By studying 400 children, it was found that increased dietary intake of polyphenols is associated with a lower risk of ADHD.
BackgroundPrevious research found that diets high in fruits and vegetables improved symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Nevertheless, the relationship between dietary polyphenol intake and the risk of ADHD was not assessed. ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to see if there was a relationship between dietary polyphenol intake and the risk of ADHD in children in preschool and elementary school. MethodsA total of 400 children aged 4 to 12 years old participated in this case-control research (200 children with diagnosed ADHD and 200 healthy controls). The presence of ADHD was diagnosed according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-V criteria. To calculate dietary polyphenol intake, a 168-item food frequency questionnaire and the Phenol-Explorer database were used. ResultsA significant negative association was observed between one unit increase in dietary polyphenol intake and risk of ADHD (OR: 0.995, 95% CI = 0.994 to 0.996, P < 0.001) in the crude model. This finding was still significant even after adjusting for body mass index, energy intake, socioeconomic status, gender, and age (OR: 0.992, 95% CI = 0.989 to 0.995, P < 0.001). ConclusionWe found that the increased dietary intake of polyphenols is associated with a lower risk of ADHD in preschool and school children. Prospective studies are needed to corroborate these observations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据