4.4 Article

Patient-provider communication while using a clinical decision support tool: explaining satisfaction with shared decision making for mammography screening

期刊

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12911-022-02058-3

关键词

Breast cancer screening; Clinical decision support tool; Computational text analysis; Decisional satisfaction; Shared decision-making

资金

  1. Community-Academic Partnerships core of the University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (UW ICTR)
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  3. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute [9 U54 TR000021]
  4. University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center [K24 CA194251]
  5. Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China [P30 CA014520]
  6. Shanghai Pujiang Program [19YJC860029]
  7. [2020PJC056]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines how patterns of verbal communication and system use of a decision aid predict patients' satisfaction with shared decision making for screening mammography. The results suggest that providers' use of quantitative language and patients' question-asking are associated with different levels of satisfaction, and looping through the decision aid improves satisfaction.
BackgroundClinical decision aids may support shared decision-making for screening mammography. To inform shared decision-making between patients and their providers, this study examines how patterns of using an EHR-integrated decision aid and accompanying verbal patient-provider communication predict decision-making satisfaction. MethodsFor 51 patient visits during which a mammography decision aid was used, linguistic characteristics of patient-provider verbal communication were extracted from transcribed audio recordings and system logs automatically captured uses of the decision aid. Surveys assessed patients' post-visit decisional satisfaction and its subcomponents. Linear mixed effects models assessed how patients' satisfaction with decision making was related to patterns of verbal communication and navigation of the decision aid. ResultsThe results indicate that providers' use of quantitative language during the encounter was positively associated with patients' overall satisfaction, feeling informed, and values clarity. Patients' question-asking was negatively associated with overall satisfaction, values clarity, and certainty perception. Where system use data indicated the dyad had cycled through the decision-making process more than once ( looping back through pages of the decision aid), patients reported improved satisfaction with shared decision making and all subcomponents. Overall satisfaction, perceived support, certainty, and perceived effectiveness of decision-making were lowest when a high number of navigating clicks occurred absent looping. ConclusionsLinguistic features of patient-provider communication and system use data of a decision aid predict patients' satisfaction with shared decision making. Our findings have implications for the design of decision aid tools and clinician training to support more effective shared decision-making for screening mammography.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据