4.3 Article

Pitavastatin Compared with Differential Intervention Trial by Standard Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Dyslipidemia on Chronic Hemodialysis (DIALYSIS): A Randomized Controlled Trial

期刊

BLOOD PURIFICATION
卷 52, 期 5, 页码 483-492

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000528763

关键词

Dyslipidemia; Hemodialysis; Cardiovascular diseases; Mortality; Statins

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compares the effects of pitavastatin and standard therapy on mortality and cardiovascular events in chronic hemodialysis patients with dyslipidemia, and finds that pitavastatin is more effective than standard therapy.
Introduction: Statin has been reported to reduce cardiovascular events. However, the comparative efficacy of statin with standard therapy on cardiovascular events has not been sufficiently reported in patients on chronic hemodialysis. Thus, this study aimed to compare the effects of pitavastatin and standard therapy on mortality and cardiovascular events in chronic hemodialysis patients with dyslipidemia in Japan. Methods: Patients on chronic hemodialysis with dyslipidemia were randomized into pitavastatin-administered (pitavastatin group) or dietary therapy as standard therapy (control) group. Primary outcomes are all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction; secondary outcomes are cardiac arrest and fatal myocardial infarction. The composite outcomes included the incidence of coronary intervention, stroke, fracture, and hospitalization due to heart failure and unstable angina. The clinical outcome analyses used a logistic regression model to categorize the variables. A p value of Results: This study included 848 patients (422 in the control group and 426 in the pitavastatin group) from 79 health facilities. The mean age of the patients was 60.1 +/- 10.3 years, and the dialysis period was 7.2 +/- 7.6 years. The mean observation period was 36.5 months. The low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was significantly lower than the baseline value in the pitavastatin group after 12 months of trial (79.8 +/- 26.1 vs. 107.8 +/- 25.5 mg/dL, p < 0.001). Moreover, the total number of deaths was 85, of which 50 occurred in the control group and 35 in the pitavastatin group. In an analysis adjusted for confounding factors due to participant attributes, there was a significant difference between the control group and the pitavastatin group in the primary and composite endpoints (p = 0.007 and p = 0.022, respectively). Conclusion: Our study has demonstrated that aggressive intervention with pitavastatin is more effective than the standard (dietary) therapy for improving the clinical outcomes in patients with dyslipidemia on chronic hemodialysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据