4.8 Article

Specific lateral flow detection of isothermal nucleic acid amplicons for accurate point-of-care testing

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 222, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2022.114989

关键词

Lateral flow assay; Recombinase polymerase amplification; Peptide nucleic acids; Point-of-care testing; SARS-CoV-2

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, an accurate point-of-care testing (POCT) platform was proposed by specific recognition of target amplicons with peptide nucleic acid (PNA, assisted by T7 Exonuclease), which efficiently eliminated false positives and showed high sensitivity and specificity for detecting SARS-CoV-2.
For point-of-care testing (POCT), coupling isothermal nucleic acid amplification schemes (e.g., recombinase polymerase amplification, RPA) with lateral flow assay (LFA) readout is an ideal platform, since such integration offers both high sensitivity and deployability. However, isothermal schemes typically suffers from non-specific amplification, which is difficult to be differentiated by LFA and thus results in false-positives. Here, we pro-posed an accurate POCT platform by specific recognition of target amplicons with peptide nucleic acid (PNA, assisted by T7 Exonuclease), which could be directly plugged into the existing RPA kits and commercial LFA test strips. With SARS-CoV-2 as the model, the proposed method (RPA-TeaPNA-LFA) efficiently eliminated the false -positives, exhibiting a lowest detection concentration of 6.7 copies/mu L of RNA and 90 copies/mu L of virus. Using dual-gene (orf1ab and N genes of SARS-CoV-2) as the targets, RPA-TeaPNA-LFA offered a high specificity (100%) and sensitivity (RT-PCR Ct < 31, 100%; Ct < 40, 71.4%), and is valuable for on-site screening or self-testing during isolation. In addition, the dual test lines in the test strips were successfully explored for simultaneous detection of SARS-CoV-2 and H1N1, showing great potential in response to future pathogen-based pandemics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据