4.5 Article

Flexible Functional Composites for Athlete Health and Performance and Auxiliary Training Applications

期刊

BIORESOURCES
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 2408-2425

出版社

NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV DEPT WOOD & PAPER SCI
DOI: 10.15376/biores.18.1.Zuo

关键词

Composites; Graphene; MXene; Polymer; Health monitoring

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flexible functional composites have been identified as having great potential for athlete health monitoring and auxiliary training. However, there is limited review on their applications in these fields. This mini-review summarizes the applications, synthesis methods, structures, properties, and future development directions of three types of functional composites for athlete health monitoring and auxiliary training. The results demonstrate that these composites display excellent properties and promising potential for applications in athlete health monitoring and auxiliary training.
Flexible functional composites have great potential for a variety of applications in the fields of athlete health monitoring and auxiliary training. There are a few recent reports on various functional composites such as graphene-based composites, MXene-based composites, and polymerbased composites, etc. However, the applications of flexible functional composites for athlete health monitoring and auxiliary training have yet to be widely reviewed. This mini-review summarizes these three types of functional composites for the applications of athlete health monitoring and auxiliary training. The synthetic methods, structures, and properties of functional composites are reviewed via some typical examples. The authors focus on the properties of functional composites as sensors for health-monitoring. Moreover, future development directions are suggested based on the authors' knowledge. This review article demonstrates that these flexible functional composites can display excellent properties and promising potential for applications in athlete health monitoring and auxiliary training.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据