4.8 Article

Accelerating denitrification and mitigating nitrite accumulation by multiple electron transfer pathways between Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 and denitrifying microbial community

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 368, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.128336

关键词

Denitrification; Exoelectrogens; Interspecies electron transfer; Nitrite accumulation; Nitrate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that the use of S. oneidensis MR-1 in combination with denitrifying microbial community can significantly enhance the bio-denitrification process through interspecies electron transfer (IET). The nitrogen removal rate was increased by 74.74% and the accumulation of nitrite was greatly reduced. The results also indicated that mediated interspecies electron transfer (MIET) played a role in enhancing denitrification, as observed when S. oneidensis MR-1 was separated by a dialysis bag.
The bio-denitrification was usually retarded by the unbalance of electron generation and consumption. In this study, mixing S. oneidensis MR-1 with denitrifying microbial community increased the nitrogen removal rate by 74.74 % via the interspecies electron transfer (IET), and reduced the accumulated nitrite from 9.90 +/- 0.81 to 0.02 +/- 0.03 mg/L. Enhanced denitrification still appeared but relatively decreased, when S. oneidensis MR-1 was separated by a dialysis bag (MW < 3000), indicating mediated interspecies electron transfer (MIET) counted in IET. The results of electron transfer activity and sludge conductivity suggested DIET and MIET jointly transfer electrons from MR-1 to electroactive denitrifying bacteria (EDB), improving denitrifying reductase activities. Electron distribution among denitrifying reductases was found to be associated with the IET rate. Microbial insights showed the total abundance of EDB was increased, and denitrifying genes were correspondingly enriched. Pseudomonas was found to cooperate with exoelectrogens in a complicated microbial community.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据