4.8 Article

Evaluation of physicochemical properties, bacterial community, and product fertility during rice straw composting supplemented with different nitrogen-rich wastes

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 369, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.128462

关键词

Rice straw; Composting; Nitrogen -rich wastes; Fertility; Bacterial community

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the compostability of rice straw with different nitrogen-rich wastes and compared their effects on organic matter degradation, maturity, fertility, and bacterial community structure. The addition of food waste was found to be the most effective in accelerating rice straw degradation and improving end-product fertility. The succession of the bacterial community was also enhanced with food waste supplementation. This study provides a promising alternative method for the disposal of a larger amount of rice straw in a shorter time.
This study evaluated the compostability of rice straw as the main feedstock (75 % in dry weight), supplemented with three different nitrogen-rich wastes, namely food waste (FW), dairy manure (DM), and sewage sludge (SS). Organic matter (OM) degradation, maturity and fertility of the end-product, and bacterial community structure during the composting processes were compared. All composting processes generated mature end-product within 51 days. Notably, FW addition was more effective to accelerate rice straw OM degradation and significantly improved end-product fertility with a high yield of Chinese cabbage. The succession of the bacterial community was accelerated with FW supplementation. Genera Geobacillus, Chryseolinea, and Blastocatella were significantly enriched during the composting of rice straw with FW supplementation. Finally, temperature, total nitrogen, moisture, pH, and total carbon were the key factors affecting microorganisms. This study provides a promising alternative method to enhance the disposal of larger amounts of rice straw in a shorter time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据