4.7 Article

Design, synthesis, and evaluation of pyrido.[3,4-b]pyrazin-2(1H)-one derivatives as potent FLT3 inhibitors

期刊

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 79, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2023.117155

关键词

FLT3; FLT3-D835Y; Acute myeloid leukemia; Structure -activity relationships

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study describes the design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of a novel series of potent pyrido.[3,4-b]pyrazin-2(1H)-one derivatives as FLT3 inhibitors for AML. Compound 13 demonstrated the most potent kinase activity against FLT3-D835Y and excellent antiproliferative activity against MV4-11 cells. Moreover, compound 13 efficiently inhibited the growth of multiple mutant BaF3 cells expressing different FLT3 mutations. These findings suggest that compound 13 is a promising candidate for AML treatment.
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized by fast progression and low survival rates, in which Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) receptor mutations have been identified as driver mutations in a subgroup of AML patients. Herein, we describe the design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of a novel series of potent pyrido. [3,4-b]pyrazin-2(1H)-one derivatives as FLT3 inhibitors. The compounds exhibited moderate to potent FLT3 kinase inhibitory potency and excellent antiproliferative activities against MV4-11 cells. Among them, compound 13 demonstrated the most potent kinase activity against FLT3-D835Y (IC50 = 29.54 +/- 4.76 nM) and cellular potency against MV4-11 cells (IC50 = 15.77 +/- 0.15 nM). Compound 13 also efficiently inhibited the growth of multiple mutant BaF3 cells expressing FLT3-D835V/F, FLT3-F691L, and FLT3-ITD/D835Y. Furthermore, compound 13 was metabolically stable in mouse liver microsomes. Moreover, the treatment with compound 13 led to robust inhibition of FLT3 autophosphorylation on Tyr589/591 in MV4-11 cells. In summary, our data demonstrated that 13 was worthy of further study for the treatment of AML.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据