4.5 Article

Instrumental variable estimation of the causal hazard ratio

期刊

BIOMETRICS
卷 79, 期 2, 页码 539-550

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/biom.13792

关键词

causal inference; Cox model; marginal structural model; survival analysis; unmeasured confounding

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cox‘s proportional hazards model is widely used in statistical analysis to evaluate the relationship between exposure and a censored failure time outcome. However, when confounding factors are not fully observed, the estimated hazard ratio can be biased due to unmeasured confounding. In this paper, we propose a novel approach using a binary instrumental variable to identify and estimate the causal hazard ratio, while accounting for unmeasured confounding. Our approach provides a consistent estimator for the causal hazard ratio, and we derive its asymptotic distribution and an estimator for its asymptotic variance. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach through simulation studies and a real data application.
Cox's proportional hazards model is one of the most popular statistical models to evaluate associations of exposure with a censored failure time outcome. When confounding factors are not fully observed, the exposure hazard ratio estimated using a Cox model is subject to unmeasured confounding bias. To address this, we propose a novel approach for the identification and estimation of the causal hazard ratio in the presence of unmeasured confounding factors. Our approach is based on a binary instrumental variable, and an additional no-interaction assumption in a first-stage regression of the treatment on the IV and unmeasured confounders. We propose, to the best of our knowledge, the first consistent estimator of the (population) causal hazard ratio within an instrumental variable framework. A version of our estimator admits a closed-form representation. We derive the asymptotic distribution of our estimator and provide a consistent estimator for its asymptotic variance. Our approach is illustrated via simulation studies and a data application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据