4.6 Article

Electrode-brain interface fractional order modelling for brain tissue classification in SEEG

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2022.104050

关键词

Brain electrode interface modelling; Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG); Non-integer order identification; Brain tissue differentiation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper explores differences in brain tissue through the modeling of the brain electrode interface from SEEG recordings. Using a physical model and non-parametric study, the authors successfully identify the brain tissue types and achieve a high classification accuracy.
Epileptic patients with drug resistant epilepsy can undergo invasive stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) examination in order to identify the epileptic zone to be removed with surgery. The correct classification of the brain tissue the electrodes are inserted in is decisive for the final clinical decision. The objective of this paper is to explore differences in brain tissue via the modelling of the brain electrode interface from SEEG recordings. The proposed model is based on the physical properties of the electrode-brain interface already presented in literature, and considers the voltage of three consecutive SEEG contacts. An identification algorithm is proposed considering constraints from the physical model and prior knowledge of the values of the components and a non-parametric study. Parameter models are identified using the data of 19 different patients, and validated by visual inspection and cross-correlation tests. Differences in the resistance of white and grey matter are observed using the coefficients of the identified models. From this coefficients, an accuracy of 73 +/- 6% is achieved for heterogeneous tissue classification of triplets of contacts. The information obtained from the study of the electrode-brain interface using typical SEEG signals proposed in this paper can be used to estimate tissue composition between triplets of consecutive SEEG contacts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据