4.7 Article

Aβ40 Reduces P-Glycoprotein at the Blood-Brain Barrier through the Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 36, 期 6, 页码 1930-1941

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0350-15.2016

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; blood-brain barrier; P-glycoprotein; transporter; ubiquitin-proteasome system

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging Grant [1R01AG039621]
  2. 3M Science and Technology Doctoral Fellowship
  3. 3M Grant [P01-AG005119-20]
  4. Division of Intramural Research at National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences/National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Failure to clear amyloid-beta (A beta) from the brain is in part responsible for A beta brain accumulation in Alzheimer's disease (AD). A critical protein for clearing A beta across the blood-brain barrier is the efflux transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in the luminal plasma membrane of the brain capillary endothelium. P-gp is reduced at the blood-brain barrier in AD, which has been shown to be associated with A beta brain accumulation. However, the mechanism responsible for P-gp reduction in AD is not well understood. Here we focused on identifying critical mechanistic steps involved in reducing P-gp in AD. We exposed isolated rat brain capillaries to 100 nM A beta 40, A beta 40, aggregated A beta 40, and A beta 42. We observed that only A beta 40 triggered reduction of P-gp protein expression and transport activity levels; this occurred in a dose-and time-dependent manner. To identify the steps involved in A beta-mediated P-gp reduction, we inhibited protein ubiquitination, protein trafficking, and the ubiquitin-proteasome system, and monitored P-gp protein expression, transport activity, and P-gp-ubiquitin levels. Thus, exposing brain capillaries to A beta 40 triggers ubiquitination, internalization, and proteasomal degradation of P-gp. These findings may provide potential therapeutic targets within the blood-brain barrier to limit P-gp degradation in AD and improve A beta brain clearance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据