4.8 Article

Substrate stiffness enhances human regulatory T cell induction and metabolism

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 292, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121928

关键词

Treg induction; Metabolism; Transcriptomes; Mechanosensing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) have the potential to suppress immune response and treat autoimmune diseases. This report investigates the induction of Tregs by modulating the mechanical stiffness of the activating substrate. It was found that Treg induction increased with greater material stiffness and involved oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). Inhibition of ATP synthase reduced Treg induction, while activation of AMPK increased it on softer substrates. This mechanosensitive and OXPHOS-dependent mechanism provides new strategies for enhancing Treg production in cellular immunotherapy.
Regulatory T cells (Tregs) provide an essential tolerance mechanism to suppress the immune response. Induced Tregs hold the potential to treat autoimmune diseases in adoptive therapy and can be produced with stimulating signals to CD3 and CD28 in presence of the cytokine TGF-8 and IL-2. This report examines the modulation of human Treg induction by leveraging the ability of T cells to sense the mechanical stiffness of an activating substrate. Treg induction on polyacrylamide gels (PA-gels) was sensitive to the substrate's elastic modulus, increasing with greater material stiffness. Single-cell RNA-Seq analysis revealed that Treg induction on stiffer substrates involved greater use of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). Inhibition of ATP synthase significantly reduced the rate of Treg induction and abrogated the difference among gels while activation of AMPK (AMP-activated protein kinase) increased Treg induction on the softer sample but not on the harder sample. Treg in-duction is thus mechanosensitive and OXPHOS-dependent, providing new strategies for improving the produc-tion of these cells for cellular immunotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据