4.1 Article

Reasons for the Reduction in the Population of the Western Subspecies of the Bean Goose (Anser fabalis fabalis and Anser fabalis rossicus): What Do the Ringing Data Say?

期刊

BIOLOGY BULLETIN
卷 49, 期 7, 页码 839-850

出版社

PLEIADES PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1134/S1062359022070147

关键词

Anser fabalis fabalis; taiga bean goose; tundra bean goose; life span; seasonal distribution; migration routes; bird ringing

类别

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research
  2. State Assignment of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation [19-44-890003 r_a]
  3. [AAAA-A19-119021190073-8]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the ring recovery data of bean geese in the Netherlands and investigated the survival periods and seasonal distribution of the A. f. fabalis and A. f. rossicus subspecies. The findings suggest that A. f. fabalis subspecies is subjected to higher hunting pressure and this could be one of the reasons for the sharp decline in their population.
An analysis of the data of the ring recoveries from bean geese (Anser fabalis), ringed from 1960 to 2013 on wintering grounds in the Netherlands, where a subspecies was indicated for a significant part of the birds (A. f. fabalis or A. f. rossicus), is given. Most of the finds were registered on the territory of the former Soviet Union, mainly in the Russian Federation. The hypothesis is tested that the subspecies A. f. fabalis is exposed to more hunting pressure than A. f. rossicus. To test this, a comparison is made of the survival periods of birds of the two subspecies and an analysis of the seasonal distribution of finds of ringed birds. The average life expectancy of A. f. fabalis (compared to A. f. rossicus), a long-term shift in the timing of production in the direction of spring hunting, and the possible change in wintering regions of the bean goose (increase in the importance of Eastern European wintering) as another reason for the sharp decrease in the number of wintering A. f. fabalis in the Netherlands are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据