4.3 Article

Investigation of the P1′ and P2′ sites of IQF substrates and their selectivity toward 20S proteasome subunits

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 404, 期 2-3, 页码 221-227

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/hsz-2022-0261

关键词

20s proteasome subunits; internally quenched fluorescence substrate; P1 ' position; P2 ' position; substrate specificity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High expression and activity of 20S proteasome are associated with various pathologies. This study focuses on distinguishing between different catalytic subunits and synthesizing IQF substrates to detect proteasome activity. The findings show that elongating the substrate at specific positions increases specificity and allows for the development of novel diagnostic tools for proteasome-dependent disorders.
High levels of expression and activity of the 20S proteasome have been linked to many types of pathologies, including neoplasia, autoimmune disorders, neurodegenerative diseases and many more. Moreover, distinguishing between 20S proteasome catalytic subunits is neglected, although it may provide further insight into the development of pathologies. Several approaches have been developed to detect 20S proteasome activity, one of which is internally quenched fluorescent (IQF) substrates, which currently suffer from low efficiency and sensitivity. Previous reports focused on peptides including natural amino acids; therefore, in this report, we synthesized and analyzed IQF substrates with both natural and unnatural amino acids in the P1' and P2' positions to investigate their influences on selectivity toward 20S proteasome subunits. We found that elongation of the substrate by the P1' and P2' positions increased specificity in comparison to tetrapeptides. Moreover, we were able to obtain IQF substrates for the Ch-L subunit, which was characterized by higher selectivity than formerly used tetrapeptides. These findings may further contribute to the development of novel diagnostic tools for 20S proteasome-dependent disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据