4.7 Article

Corrosion inhibition of deposit-covered X80 pipeline steel in seawater containing Pseudomonas stutzeri

期刊

BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY
卷 149, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2022.108279

关键词

Microbiologically influenced corrosion; Under -deposit corrosion; Pseudomonas stutzeri; Corrosion inhibition; X80 pipeline steel

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the inhibition of corrosion of deposit-covered pipeline steel in seawater containing CO2 in the presence of Pseudomonas stutzeri. The results showed that the presence of deposits led to a decline in the corrosion rates of the steel, and the corrosion rates were slower when P. stutzeri was present. The corrosion inhibition efficiency of P. stutzeri was reduced in the presence of deposits, likely due to the lowered biological activity.
Under-deposit corrosion, a typical corrosion type, is a major threat to the safe running of pipeline steel in marine environment. Under-deposit corrosion behaviour and mechanism still require further investigation, especially when there is participation of microorganisms. In this work, the inhibition of corrosion of deposit-covered X80 pipeline steel due to the presence of Pseudomonas stutzeri in seawater containing CO2 was investigated using weight loss, electrochemical measurements, a wire beam electrode and surface analysis. The results show that steel corrosion rates decline rapidly due to the covered deposit in the presence or absence P. stutzeri, but corrosion rates were slower in the presence of P. stutzeri. The highest corrosion rates were (0.365 +/- 0.021) mm/y and (0.230 +/- 0.001) mm/y in abiotic and biotic conditions, respectively. The corrosion inhibition efficiency of P. stutzeri was reduced in the presence of deposits, because the deposits led to a lowered biological activity. The galvanic current density between deposit-covered and bare specimens in seawater was weakened by P. stutzeri, leading to diminshed corrosion, especially pitting corrosion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据