4.4 Review

Deciphering the mechanism and function of Hsp100 unfoldases from protein structure

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BST20220590

关键词

-

资金

  1. Robert A. Welch Foundation
  2. National Institutes of Health
  3. [Q-1530-20220331]
  4. [R01-GM142143]
  5. [S10-OD030246]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hsp100 chaperones, also known as Clp proteins, are a family of ATPases that play important roles in cells and organelles by using metabolic energy to unfold proteins and break down protein aggregates. Recent research has provided new mechanistic insights into the structure and function of this group of chaperones.
Hsp100 chaperones, also known as Clp proteins, constitute a family of ring-forming ATPases that differ in 3D structure and cellular function from other stress-inducible molecular chaperones. While the vast majority of ATP-dependent molecular chaperones promote the folding of either the nascent chain or a newly imported polypeptide to reach its native conformation, Hsp100 chaperones harness metabolic energy to perform the reverse and facilitate the unfolding of a misfolded polypeptide or protein aggregate. It is now known that inside cells and organelles, different Hsp100 members are involved in rescuing stress-damaged proteins from a previously aggregated state or in recycling polypeptides marked for degradation. Protein degradation is mediated by a barrel-shaped peptidase that physically associates with the Hsp100 hexamer to form a two-component system. Notable examples include the ClpA:ClpP (ClpAP) and ClpX:ClpP (ClpXP) pro-teases that resemble the ring-forming FtsH and Lon proteases, which unlike ClpAP and ClpXP, feature the ATP-binding and proteolytic domains in a single polypeptide chain. Recent advances in electron cryomicroscopy (cryoEM) together with single-molecule bio-physical studies have now provided new mechanistic insight into the structure and func-tion of this remarkable group of macromolecular machines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据