4.5 Article

Effects of rifampicin on porphyrin metabolism in healthy volunteers

期刊

BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY
卷 132, 期 3, 页码 281-291

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.13826

关键词

coproporphyrin I; pentaporphyrin; pregnane X receptor; protoporphyrin IX; rifampicin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of PXR activation on porphyrin metabolism and found that rifampicin increased the excretion of certain urinary porphyrin metabolites and decreased faecal protoporphyrin IX excretion. This suggests that increased excretion may serve as a hepatoprotective shunt when haem synthesis or porphyrin levels are increased.
Pregnane X receptor (PXR) is known to stimulate haem synthesis, but detailed knowledge on the effects of PXR activation on porphyrin metabolism in humans is lacking. We utilized a randomized, crossover, open (blinded laboratory) and placebo-controlled trial with 600-mg rifampicin or placebo dosed for a week to investigate the effects of PXR activation on erythrocyte, plasma, faecal and urine porphyrins. Sixteen healthy volunteers participated on the trial, but the number of volunteers for blood and urine porphyrin analyses was 15 while the number of samples for faecal analyses was 14. Rifampicin increased urine pentaporphyrin concentration 3.7-fold (mean 1.80 +/- 0.6 vs. 6.73 +/- 4.4 nmol/L, p = 0.003) in comparison with placebo. Urine coproporphyrin I increased 23% (p = 0.036). Faecal protoporphyrin IX decreased (mean 31.6 +/- 23.5 vs. 19.2 +/- 27.8 nmol/g, p = 0.023). The number of blood erythrocytes was slightly elevated, and plasma bilirubin, catabolic metabolite of haem, was decreased. In conclusion, rifampicin dosing elevated the excretion of certain urinary porphyrin metabolites and decreased faecal protoporphyrin IX excretion. As urine pentaporphyrin and coproporphyrin I are not precursors in haem biosynthesis, increased excretion may serve as a hepatoprotective shunt when haem synthesis or porphyrin levels are increased.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据