4.7 Article

A blockchain 3.0 paradigm for digital twins in construction project management

期刊

AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION
卷 145, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104645

关键词

Blockchain 3; 0; Construction project management; Digital twin; Smart contract; Modular construction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Construction project management (CPM) is complex and distributed, and digital twin and blockchain are considered as promising solutions. This paper proposes ChainPM as a Blockchain 3.0 paradigm, extending Blockchain 2.0 with innovative indexing, query, and analysis functions for key CPM data. Experimental results showed significant reduction in information synchronization latency and the functions of ChainPM worked well without network connections. ChainPM contributes to the trend of Blockchain 3.0 paradigms for CPM digital twins, addressing barriers of internet reliance and information delay.
Construction project management (CPM) is inherently complex and distributed, while digital twin and block -chain are recognized as promising solutions for information-reliant CPM. By learning from the lessons of Blockchain 1.0 and 2.0 paradigms in the literature, such as slow synchronization and failed offline functions, this paper proposes ChainPM as a Blockchain 3.0 paradigm. ChainPM extends Blockchain 2.0 with innovative indexing, query, and analysis function sets for key CPM data. Experimental results from a pilot study of a modular construction project showed that the information synchronization latency was reduced by 99.2% to 99.8%, and query and analytical functions worked equally well without network connections. ChainPM con-tributes to a novel trend of Blockchain 3.0 paradigms for CPM digital twins, emphasizing indexing key CPM data, combinatorial query, digital authorship, and fast response without downgrading the 'single source of truth.' For practitioners, ChainPM addresses key barriers of Internet reliance and information delay to CPM digital twins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据