4.7 Review

Summary and derived Risk Assessment of 3D printing emission studies

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
卷 294, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119501

关键词

3D printing; Indoor air quality; Volatile organic compounds; Ultrafine particles; Nano particles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review of 50 studies on 3D printing with the material extrusion method summarizes that higher printing temperature leads to higher emissions, styrene is the main volatile organic compound emitted during ABS printing, released particles are in the nano range, and filaments with additives could pose health risks. In vivo and in vitro studies show toxic effects. Therefore, it is recommended to print in a well-ventilated area, use the lowest possible print temperature, and be cautious with filaments containing particulate additives.
Three-dimensional (3D) printing is an additive manufacturing process that increases in application and consumer popularity. Studies with 3D printers have shown that the printing process releases particles and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). This review looked at 50 studies that analyzed the most commonly used printing process in consumer 3D printers, the material extrusion or so-called fused filament fabrication (FFF) method and summarizes the most important results. Although the reviewed studies often used different methods, general assumptions can be drawn: Higher printing temperature resulted in higher emissions, styrene was the main VOC emitted during printing with ABS, the size of released particles was in the nano range and filaments with additives could pose a higher risk due to the possible release of e.g., carbon nanotubes (CNTs). In vivo and in vitro studies showed toxic effects. Thus, we recommend: printing in a separated and ventilated room, using the lowest possible print temperature and be cautious with filaments containing particulate additives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据