4.6 Article

Combining HIPPARCOS and Gaia data for the study of binaries: The BINARYS tool

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 672, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244144

关键词

astrometry; binaries; general; stars; low-mass; brown dwarfs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study combines absolute astrometric data from HIPPARCOS and Gaia with relative astrometry and/or radial velocity measurements to determine the masses of individual stars in three binary systems. The results provide a rare test of evolutionary model predictions at young ages in the low-stellar-mass range.
Context. Orbital motion in binary and planetary systems is the main source of precise stellar and planetary mass measurements, and the joint analysis of data obtained using multiple observational methods can both lift degeneracies and improve precision.Aims. We set out to measure the masses of individual stars in binary systems using all the information brought by the HIPPARCOS and Gaia absolute astrometric missions.Methods. We present BINARYS, a tool that uses the HIPPARCOS and Gaia absolute astrometric data and combines them with relative astrometry and/or radial velocity measurements to determine the orbit of a binary system. This tool rigorously combines the HIPPARCOS and Gaia data (here EDR3) and can use the HIPPARCOS Transit Data as needed for binaries where HIPPARCOS detects significant flux from the secondary component. It also supports the case where Gaia has resolved the system, giving an astrometric solution for both components.Results. We determine model-independent individual masses for the first time for three systems: the two mature binaries Gl 494 (M-1 = 0.584 +/- 0.003 M-circle dot and M-2 = 87 +/- 1 M-Jup) and HIP 88745 (M-1 = 0.96 +/- 0.02 M-circle dot and 0.62(-0.008)(+0.009) ), and the younger AB Dor member GJ 2060 (1926(-6)(+7) and 0.882 (+0.004)(-0.005)). The latter provides a rare test of evolutionary model predictions at young ages in the low-stellar-mass range and sets a lower age limit of 100 Myr for the moving group.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据