4.7 Article

Meta-analysis of studies on protection provided by different prophylactic agents, their routes of administration and incubation times against nodavirus infection in Macrobrachium rosenbergii

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 565, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.739125

关键词

Giant freshwater prawn; Macrobrachium rosenbergii nodavirus; White tail disease; Prophylaxis; Treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This meta-analysis assesses the effectiveness of different prophylactic agents in promoting the survival of giant freshwater prawns infected with Macrobrachium rosenbergii nodavirus (MrNV) and extra small virus (XSV). The study found that DNA/RNA prophylaxis, viral protein-based prophylaxis, and supplements all provided protection against MrNV infection. A shorter incubation period and prophylactic agents derived from MrNV origin were found to be more effective. However, a high degree of heterogeneity was detected between studies, indicating the need for future large-scale studies.
White tail disease caused by Macrobrachium rosenbergii nodavirus (MrNV) and extra small virus (XSV) is an infection that primarily affects giant freshwater prawns, Macrobrachium rosenbergii, which in turn causes significant economic losses in aquaculture farms worldwide. In response, different prophylactic agents have been studied to improve resistance to this infection. This meta-analysis aims to assess the effectiveness of different prophylactic agents in promoting shrimp survival. Embase, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus search engines were used to search for relevant articles from 2000 to 2022. Articles were screened to only select articles studying crustaceans being given prophylaxis before the disease challenge. Treatments were analyzed on overall survival, and we performed subgroup analysis of treatment type, administration routes, treatment incubation time pre-infection, and whether the prophylactic agents were derived from MrNV, XSV, or a mixture of both. Between the 3 major prophylaxis types, DNA/RNA prophylaxis, viral protein-based prophylaxis, and supplements, all conferred protection against MrNV infection, though no differences between groups were observed. A shorter incubation period (<= 7 days) conferred better protection, and prophylactic agents from MrNV origin were found to be more effective. A high degree of heterogeneity was detected between studies, necessitating future large-scale studies addressing possible bias.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据