4.7 Article

Analysis and optimization of the performance for the ground source heat pump system with the middle-deep U-type well

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 219, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.119404

关键词

Middle-deep geothermal energy; Ground source heat pump; U-type well; Performance; Heat pump unit; Heat transfer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the structural characteristics and energy equations of the U-type well, and analyzes the heat load and optimization of a building with a ground source heat pump system. The results demonstrate the significant improvement in performance achieved through optimization measures.
Extract heat without water extraction technology in the middle-deep geothermal energy utilization has attracted increasing attentions, and the U-type well is a significant ground heat exchanger (GHE) of ground source heat pump (GSHP) system. This paper describes the structural characteristics and establishes the energy equations for the U-type well, and summarizes both the initial and the boundary conditions of the heat transfer process. Afterwards, a certain building with a GSHP system is selected, and the hourly heat load is investigated via the TRNSYS simulation platform; the components of the system are discussed. Next, the models of the heat pump unit, the water pump and other elements are established to lay a firm foundation for the optimization of the system, and therefore the optimization of the research route are conducted. Finally, the parameters or cases influencing the performance of the heat pump unit are analyzed, and the optimized and the existing results are compared to demonstrate the significance of optimization; the COP can be increased by more than 25% while the optimized measures are employed. The research results of this paper can facilitate the development of the GSHP systems with the U-type well, and promote the popularization and application of the middle-deep geothermal energy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据