4.7 Article

Blue TiO2 with tunable oxygen-vacancy defects for enhanced photocatalytic diesel oil degradation

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 611, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155716

关键词

Photocatalysis; Diesel oil degradation; Titanium dioxide; Oxygen vacancy; Surface defect engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The proliferation of marine petroleum exploitation has caused oil spills in the aquatic ecosystem. Photocatalysis using blue TiO2 with oxygen vacancies can efficiently degrade diesel oil and improve degradation performance compared to pristine TiO2.
The proliferation of marine petroleum exploitation has culminated in the undesired release of oils into the aquatic ecosystem, causing detrimental environmental effects. Photocatalysis proffers a solution to degrade recalcitrant diesel oil utilizing abundant solar energy, in which TiO2 is the perennial photocatalyst of choice. However, it suffers from the low utilization of the light spectrum and the rapid recombination of photogenerated charge carriers. In this work, oxygen-vacancy-rich blue TiO2 was employed to overcome the shortcomings of TiO2 in diesel oil degradation which has historically not been attempted. These oxygen vacancies induce favourable mid gap states to extend the optical absorption capabilities and enrich the photocatalyst charge density. Additionally, oxygen vacancies enhance the separation of electron hole pairs by acting as trap states, evident from increased trap-mediated capture fluorescence. Consequently, a 1.60-fold enhancement of diesel oil degradation performance compared to pristine TiO2 was observed. Mechanistic insights revealed the restructuring of diesel alkane distribution upon degradation corollary to the cleavage of hydrocarbon chains, illustrating that short alkanes experience a greater susceptibility to degradation compared to long alkanes. GC-MS analysis elucidates that shorter chained alkanes, alkenes, alcohols and cycloalkanes were produced as a product of the degradation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据