4.7 Article

Tuning structures of Pt shells on Pd nanocubes as neutral glucose oxidation catalysts and sensors

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 605, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.154670

关键词

High-indexed facets; Nonconvex surface effect; Electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance; Glucose electrooxidation reaction; Non-enzymatic glucose sensor

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 109-2221-E-992-034-MY3]
  2. National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology [110E9010P01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the application of nanocrystals with high-indexed facets in electrocatalysis. Different Pt shell structures were synthesized on the surface of Pd nanocubes by varying the concentration of Pt precursors, and their catalytic performances were studied. The results demonstrate that nanocrystals with specific facet structures exhibit higher catalytic activity and sensitivity, showing potential as glucose sensors.
Nanocrystals with high-indexed facets and low-coordinated atoms exhibit promising electrocatalytic activities. Herein, different Pt shell structures on the surface of Pd nanocubes (Pd@Pt NCs) were synthesised by varying the concentration of Pt precursors. The concave Pd@Pt NCs were used as electrocatalysts for neutral glucose oxidation reactions (GORs); the effect of Pt structure on the catalytic performance was studied. In sequential catalysis, stellated Pd@Pt NCs (Pd@Pt SNC) with (211) facets had an electron transfer number (Ne) of 12.69 and a specific activity of 4.69 x 10(-9) mol.g.m(-2), markedly higher than that of the other concave Pd@Pt NCs. In transient catalysis, Pd NCs with Pt-coated corners (Pd@Pt CNCC) containing (210) and (950) facets demon-strated a sensitivity of 11.06 mu A.mM(-1).cm(-2) and a linear analysis range (2.4-10.6 mM). The high recoveries (98.80%-99.85%) and low relative standards (<= 1.06%) in the serum sample corroborate the potential of Pd@Pt CNCC as an enzyme-free glucose sensor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据