4.7 Article

Highly-sensitive SERS detection of tetracycline: Sub-enhancement brought by light scattering of nano-diamond

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 608, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155270

关键词

Surface-enhanced Raman scattering; Nano diamond; Sub-enhancement; Sensing; Tetracycline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antibiotic residues in wastewater pose a threat to aquatic environment and human safety. A surface-enhanced Raman scattering substrate with high sensitivity, reusability and stability has been developed for detecting antibiotic residues.
Antibiotic residues in wastewater cause a serious threat to aquatic environment and human safety. Therefore, the development of robust strategies for detecting antibiotic residues becomes critical. In this work, a surface -enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) substrate, consisting of gold nanoparticles/nano diamond/carbon nitride (Au/ND/C3N4) hybrid, which features enhanced light utilization and self-cleaning properties, is developed for sensitive sensing of tetracycline. The fabricated Au/ND/C3N4 substrate effectively captures target molecules and enhances Raman activity, owing to abundant functional groups and light scattering effect of ND. Moreover, the heterostructure formed by Au NPs, ND and C3N4 endows this SERS substrate with superior self-cleaning capa-bility, enabling its reusability. The Au/ND/C3N4 substrate exhibits high sensitivity (10-14 M), desirable repro-ducibility (RSD = 13.29 %, n = 238) and favourable stability (84.8 % of initial intensity after 30 days) for crystal violet probe. Also, no significant loss of SERS or catalytic activity is observed during cyclic SERS detection. Likewise, the detection of tetracycline at nanomolar level is achieved with good recyclability. This work proposes a distinctive strategy for enhancing SERS activity, and the developed self-cleaning Au/ND/C3N4 substrate rep-resents a potential candidate for highly sensitive detection of antibiotic residues in wastewater.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据