4.6 Article

Structural, electrical, magnetic and magnetotransport properties of La0.7Ca0.18Ba0.12Mn0.95Sn0.05O3 manganite prepared with different quenching processes

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00339-022-06302-5

关键词

Perovskite manganites; Quenching; Structure; Magnetotransport properties; Magnetic properties; Double-exchange mechanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The structural, microstructural, magnetic, electrical, and magneto-transport properties of La0.7Ca0.18Ba0.12Mn0.95Sn0.05O3 manganite powders prepared by the solid-state method were investigated. Two quenching processes, air quenching and quenching at 77K in liquid nitrogen, were performed on the samples. X-ray diffraction analysis showed that the samples crystallized in an orthorhombic structure, while scanning electron microscopy revealed granular characteristics. The magnetic measurements indicated a paramagnetic-ferromagnetic transition, and the magnetoresistance slightly increased in the sample quenched to 77K in liquid nitrogen.
Structural, microstructural, magnetic, electrical and magneto-transport properties of La0.7Ca0.18Ba0.12Mn0.95Sn0.05O3 manganite powders, prepared by the solid state method, were investigated. Two quenching processes were performed on the samples: quenching in air and quenching to 77 K in liquid nitrogen. X-ray diffraction patterns refinement revealed that the samples crystallized in the orthorhombic structure. The scanning electron microscopy micrographs presented granular characters. The magnetization vs temperature plot showed a paramagnetic-ferromagnetic transition. The inverse susceptibility chi(-1)(T) deviation from the Curie-Weiss law revealed the existence of the phase above T-C in the nitrogen-quenched sample. The hysteresis cycles reveal that the samples are ferromagnetic at 1.8 K and paramagnetic at 300 K. The resistivity curves exhibit a ferromagnetic-metallic to paramagnetic-insulating transition. The magnetoresistance increased slightly in the sample quenched to 77 K in N-2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据