4.8 Article

Application of thermal energy storage with electrified heating and cooling in a cold climate

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 328, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120147

关键词

Heat Pumps; TRNSYS; Energy System Modelling; Electrification; Decarbonization; Thermal Energy Storage; Peak Demand

资金

  1. US Department of Energy
  2. [DE-EE0007708]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the use of Thermal Energy Storage (TES) to reduce the peak daily demand of ground source heat pump (GSHP) systems and improve their cost effectiveness. The addition of TES can reduce operating costs by 4.5%, but still incurs a 5.64% increase in costs compared to a Combined Heat and Power (CHP) system. However, integrating heat pumps tactically into the CHP system is the most cost effective solution, only increasing operating costs by 4.71%.
Ground source heat pumps (GSHPs) have been shown to be an effective means of decarbonizing building heating and cooling, but the operation of these systems at scale presents challenges to sites and the grid due to increases in peak demand. In this study, we investigate how the use of Thermal Energy Storage (TES), in the form of stratified water storage, could reduce the peak daily demand associated with GSHP systems and thus improve their cost effectiveness. This system was compared to a Combined Heat and Power (CHP) plant, to investigate the potential cost and emissions impacts of electrification on large energy users transitioning from high efficiency fossil fuel equipment. This study builds on previous research by using a significant campus area, and investi-gating the various impacts of an electrified system versus a state of the art fossil fuel system. An established method of TRNSYS modeling is used for the heat pumps and borehole heat exchangers (BHEs), along with the TES. The GSHP system with TES is modeled to follow industry standards and sized to provide an optimal balance of capital and operating costs. Costs were investigated for a unique large energy user rate structure, as well as for a more common generalized rate structure. The results show that the addition of TES to the GSHP system could reduce operating costs by 4.5%, but still incurs a 5.64% cost increase from the baseline CHP system. It is also shown, however, that a tactical integration of heat pumps into the CHP system is the most cost effective solution, only increasing the operating costs by 4.71%. Likewise, the impacts of different rate structures are highlighted, with the TES only resulting in 0.75% cost savings under the generalized utility rate. Furthermore, it is shown that thermal storage has great potential for demand reduction, with the addition of storage incurring a decrease of 7-22% in annual peak demand kW, dependent on the rate structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据