4.6 Article

Extended interval dosing of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis

期刊

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2015-312940

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biogen Idec
  2. Novartis
  3. Genzyme
  4. Acorda
  5. Guthy-Jackson Charitable Foundation
  6. National Multiple Sclerosis Society
  7. Serono
  8. Navartis
  9. Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc
  10. Shire
  11. TEVA
  12. Biogen
  13. EMD Serono
  14. Acorda Therapeutics
  15. TEVA Neuroscience
  16. Genzyme Corp
  17. Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers
  18. Cerespir Inc
  19. Consortium of MS Centers
  20. D3 (Drug Discovery and Development)
  21. Genentech
  22. Innate Therapeutics
  23. Jannsen Pharmaceuticals
  24. Klein-Buendel Incorporated
  25. Medimmune
  26. Opexa Therapeutics
  27. Receptos
  28. Roche
  29. Savara Inc
  30. Spiniflex Pharmaceuticals
  31. Somahlution
  32. Teva pharmaceuticals
  33. Transparency Life Sciences
  34. PML Consortium
  35. Takeda/Millennium Pharma
  36. Glaxo Smith Klein
  37. Genentech Roche
  38. Sanofi Genzyme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Natalizumab (NTZ), a monoclonal antibody to human alpha(4)beta(1)/beta(7) integrin, is an effective therapy for multiple sclerosis (MS), albeit associated with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Clinicians have been extending the dose of infusions with a hypothesis of reducing PML risk. The aim of the study is to evaluate the clinical consequences of reducing NTZ frequency of infusion up to 8 weeks 5 days. Methods A retrospective chart review in 9 MS centres was performed in order to identify patients treated with extended interval dosing (EID) regimens of NTZ. Patients were stratified into 3 groups based on EID NTZ treatment schedule in individual centres: early extended dosing (EED; n=249) every 4 weeks 3 days to 6 weeks 6 days; late extended dosing (LED; n=274) every 7 weeks to 8 weeks 5 days; variable extended dosing (n=382) alternating between EED and LED. These groups were compared with patients on standard interval dosing (SID; n=1093) every 4 weeks. Results 17% of patients on SID had new T2 lesions compared with 14% in EID (p=0.02); 7% of patients had enhancing T1 lesions in SID compared with 9% in EID (p=0.08); annualised relapse rate was 0.14 in the SID group, and 0.09 in the EID group. No evidence of clinical or radiographic disease activity was observed in 62% of SID and 61% of EID patients (p=0.83). No cases of PML were observed in EID group compared with 4 cases in SID cohort. Conclusions Dosing intervals up to 8 weeks 5 days did not diminish effectiveness of NTZ therapy. Further monitoring is ongoing to evaluate if the risk of PML is reduced in patients on EID.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据