4.7 Article

Ventilation barrier with space-coiling channels of varying cross-section for broadband sound insulation

期刊

APPLIED ACOUSTICS
卷 201, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.109110

关键词

Ventilated acoustic barrier; Fano-like interference; Space-coiling structure; Sound attenuation; Customizing broadband

资金

  1. Defense Key Disciplines Laboratory of Ship Equipment Noise and Vibration Control Technology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University [VSN201901]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A ventilated acoustic barrier with a binary structure is proposed in this study to efficiently silence low-frequency sound while maintaining fluid free-flow. The experimental results confirm the feasibility of this design, which is consistent with theoretical predictions.
Efficient broadband silencing of low-frequency sound (<1000 Hz) while retaining the fluid free-flow remains a challenge in acoustical engineering. Here, a ventilated acoustic barrier, consisting of an unre-stricted channel and a space-coiling structure with variable cross-sections, is proposed based on Fano -like interference. With the design of the proposed binary structure, the incident sound energy can be effectively attenuated by 90 % in the range of 377 Hz to 425 Hz and 454 Hz to 518 Hz, even at a relatively large opening rate (airflow rate >73 %). Furthermore, the susceptibility of the bands to geometrical parameters and incidence angles is investigated. The structure parameters are optimized using a genetic algorithm to achieve sound attenuation in a broader band from 400 Hz to 1000 Hz. It is shown that this design demonstrates excellent viability for customizing broadband and processing sound from various directions. Experiments are performed to verify the proposed design, and the results are in agreement with the numerical calculations and theoretical predictions. The developed barrier might be potentially applicable to scenarios desiring for low-frequency noise mitigation and free airflow.(c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据