4.7 Article

A vehicle whistle database for evaluation of outdoor acoustic source localization and tracking using an intermediate-sized microphone array

期刊

APPLIED ACOUSTICS
卷 201, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.109113

关键词

Vehicle whistle database; Localization; Sound tracking

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [62001467]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a new database for evaluating ASLT algorithms, which utilizes a planar array with 32 MEMS microphones to record a large number of vehicle whistles in outdoor environments. The paper also provides an example demonstrating the localization of the vehicle whistle database using a specific sound source localization method.
Acoustic source localization and tracking (ASLT) are always hot topics for their wide applications, such as binaural hearing aids, smart devices, and audio-video conference systems. Numerous ASLT algorithms have already been proposed, however only very limited open databases were available for evaluation their performance. To date, most of these existing databases were recorded indoors using only a limited number of microphones. To the best of our knowledge, it still lacks of available open databases to evaluate ASLT algorithms for outdoor applications using an intermediate-sized microphone array. This paper describes a new database for evaluation ASLT algorithms, where a planar array with 32 MEMS microphones were designed to record a great number of vehicle whistles in outdoor environments with the vertical distance about 8 m away from the center of this array to the road surface. Besides the detailed description of this database, an example using the steered response power-phase transform sound source localization method was provided to show that the vehicle whistle database has been successfully built. The vehicle whistle database and the demo code have been uploaded and available online. (c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据