4.3 Article

Characteristics of de novo cancer in liver transplant recipients

期刊

APMIS
卷 131, 期 4, 页码 135-141

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apm.13296

关键词

Liver transplantation; de novo cancer; immunosuppressive treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the cumulative incidence of de novo cancer in Danish liver transplant recipients. It was found that 12% of the recipients developed de novo cancer after liver transplantation, with non-melanoma skin cancer being the majority. The 5-year cumulative incidences for all cancers and non-skin cancers were 10.7% and 4.9%, respectively. Thus, further larger studies are needed to identify the risk factors for de novo cancer after liver transplantation.
Liver transplant recipients receive immunosuppressive treatment to avoid organ rejection, increasing the risk of developing de novo cancer after transplantation. We investigated the cumulative incidence of de novo cancer in a cohort of Danish liver transplant recipients. The study was a retrospective cohort study of adult liver transplant recipients transplanted at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019. De novo cancer was defined as cancer arising at least 30 days after liver transplantation, excluding relapses from prior cancers and donor-derived cancers. We determined the incidence of de novo cancer in the cohort using the Aalen-Johansen estimator, with death and retransplantation as competing risks. We included 389 liver transplant recipients and identified 47 recipients (12%) with de novo cancer after liver transplantation, including 25 recipients with non-melanoma skin cancers. The cumulative incidences at 5 years after liver transplantation for all cancers and non-skin cancers were 10.7% and 4.9%, respectively. De novo cancer after liver transplantation is relatively common, with the majority being non-melanoma skin cancer. Future studies of sufficient size are needed to identify risk factors for de novo cancer after liver transplantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据