4.3 Article

Impact of Osteopenia on Pancreatic Fistula in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy

期刊

ANTICANCER RESEARCH
卷 42, 期 12, 页码 5971-5976

出版社

INT INST ANTICANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16107

关键词

Osteopenia; pancreaticoduodenectomy; pancreatic fistula

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the potential risk for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. It found that low bone mineral density (BMD), especially in patients with soft pancreas, was an independent risk factor for POPF. Preoperative assessment of osteopenia may be useful in predicting the occurrence of POPF, and vitamin D supplementation before surgery may be considered for patients with osteopenia.
Background/Aim: This study aimed to identify the potential risk for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), a major complication of pancreaticoduodenectomy. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included 124 patients with biliary and pancreatic disorders who underwent pancreatico-duodenectomy between 2015 and 2020. Bone marrow density (BMD) was determined in the 11th thoracic vertebra using preoperative computed tomographic images. Delta BMD (dBMD=measured BMD - standard BMD) was calculated using standard BMD determined on the basis of age and sex, and dBMD <0 was defined as osteopenia. The relationship between clinicopathological factors and dBMD was investigated. Results: The average BMD level was 140 Hounsfield units. BMD was significantly lower in women than in men (p<0.01) and in older patients than in younger patients (p<0.01). POPF was significantly correlated with low dBMD (p=0.032). Osteopenia was a risk factor for POPF in patients with soft pancreas (p=0.016). Conclusion: Osteopenia was an independent risk factor for POPF after pancreaticoduo-denectomy in patients with soft pancreas. Preoperative osteopenia assessment may be useful for the prediction of POPF, and preoperative vitamin D supplementation might be considered in patients with osteopenia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据